Polling Uncertainty, Explained
When pollsters report a margin of error of ±3 points, the real-world uncertainty is closer to ±6 — roughly double. The reported margin of error captures sampling error only. It does not capture non-sampling error: coverage error, non-response, mode effects, late deciders, and likely-voter modeling.
The data
This piece is built on more than 9,000 general-election polls (presidential, Senate, and gubernatorial) conducted since 1980. For each poll, the theoretical margin of error is computed as 2 × 1.96 × √(p(1−p)/n) and compared to the actual error against the certified result. The error-ratio distribution (actual error ÷ theoretical margin of error) has a median near 1.5 with a substantial right tail.
What's in the tool
- MoE calculator — shows that the margin of error for a two-candidate margin is roughly 2× the margin of error for a single proportion at the same sample size.
- Error comparison scatter — poll margin vs. actual margin, with the stated MOE band overlaid so you can see how often polls fall outside their own reported uncertainty.
- Sources of error — coverage, non-response, mode, late deciders, likely-voter modeling, partisan non-response.
- Practical takeaways — how to read polls given the true uncertainty.
Related projects
By G. Elliott Morris, author of Strength In Numbers: How Polls Work and Why We Need Them.